完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.authorChih-Cheng Yang
dc.contributor.other楊志誠
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-25T07:00:11Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-25T07:00:11Z-
dc.date.issued2012/10/30
dc.identifier.issn1682-587N
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.fcu.edu.tw/handle/2376/2498-
dc.description.abstractThis paper explores strategic competitions in Asia Pacific, and Taiwan’s role in the strategic game. Based on the research, cross-Strait relations should be probed in a broader context of the great power rivalry/cooperation in this area. _x000D_ To address the topic, it will follow two theoretical points. First, to examine the issue can be based on a theoretical model called “Pliers Strategy from the Pacific Ocean toward Eurasia.” Geostrategically, geopolitically and geoeconomically, from American west-coast to the Pacific Ocean, the U. S. can integrate the other nations and areas under her influence to design them, from functional point of view, as a pair _x000D_ of pliers which bites the Asian side of the Eurasian continent: the Korean Peninsula and the Indochina Peninsula may play the role of two edges of the geographic pliers, and Taiwan is the motional fulcrum of it. The U.S. is in the position to control this mechanism. _x000D_ Deduced from this geo-strategic assumption, it is proved that the best choice for the U.S. Asian policy is to maintain the status quo across the Taiwan Strait. Looking at the situation in this area, paradigm shift is on the agenda; the US Taiwan policy cannot be pursued due to the rise of China. There is a contradiction between America’s striving for its regional hegemony and its commitments under Taiwan Relations Act. Its support of Taiwan’s independence posture may lead to war, and there will be no winner in the region except Japan. In addition, just leaving the _x000D_ US-China’s security dilemma unresolved in the short run, the U.S. can exploit China’s influence on North Korea. _x000D_ The second point will touch upon the strategic guideline to answer the following questions: _x000D_ 1: In what way can the U. S. secure the status quo across the Strait? _x000D_ 2: How will China respond to the US arms sales to Taiwan? And will this stir up a new cycle of arms race in the region which eventually leads to the _x000D_ establishment of the comprehensive TMD system? and _x000D_ 3: Can Taiwan still remain to be ‘an unsinkable aircraft carrier”in US-China confrontations?
dc.description.sponsorship逢甲大學
dc.format.extent19
dc.language.iso英文
dc.relation.ispartofseries逢甲人文社會學報
dc.relation.isversionof第十四期
dc.subjectgeostrategy
dc.subjectgeopolitics
dc.subjectcross-strait relations
dc.subjectthe status quo
dc.subject.other地緣戰略
dc.subject.other地緣政治
dc.subject.other兩岸關係
dc.subject.other維持現況
dc.titleCross-Strait Relations: Recent Developments and the Impact on the U.S. Hegemony in Asia-Pacific
dc.title.alternative兩岸關係的新形勢對美國亞太霸權的意義
dc.type期刊篇目
dc.description.translationabstract本論文旨在探討亞太地區的戰略形勢及在此形勢下台灣的角色。根據本文的研究,兩岸關係的探討應該從更廣大的亞太戰略網絡中去瞭解,必須分析該區域相關主要國家的競爭形勢或合作形勢。該主題基本上是從二個層次加以論證:一是透過「鉗子戰略模型」的建構,其次則透過模型的演繹,探討相關的戰術議題。_x000D_ 從美國西岸往太平洋延伸,進而到廣大的歐亞大陸,依循著地緣戰略、地緣政治及地緣經濟的運行機能,美國有足夠的能力整合其亞太地區的盟邦或對其沒有敵意的國家,建構一把咬住歐亞大陸邊陲的鉗子:朝鮮半島及中南半島分別是二邊鉗口,台灣剛好是這隻鉗子的支點。美國透過這樣的戰略模型將可以立於操控的地位。_x000D_ 寰顧該區域各國權力關係的演變,隨著中國的崛起以及美日權力的消長,一般深信該區域的國際關係典範已逐漸產生了轉移;冷戰以來的美國在台政策可能也將隨之變化。以當前的形勢來看,美國想一方面堅守「台灣關係法」的承諾,同時又試圖繼續維持在該地區的霸權,顯然是越來越困難了。美國如果一味無視於台灣傾向獨立的態度,中美之間將可能爆發嚴重的衝突,甚至兵戎相見;果若如此,中、美兩國都將是輸家,而台灣可能是最大輸家;日本也許是惟一的贏家。_x000D_ 進一步來說,短期之內,台灣問題的糾葛在某種意義上也可以提供美國影響中國的空間,藉以防止北朝鮮核武問題的失控。根據該地緣戰略的模型,本文得出結論:維持台海現況將是美國亞太政策的最佳選擇。_x000D_ 本文論述的第二個層次是延伸上述的戰略準則,回應下列三項戰術運作的議題:一、美國應採取怎麼樣的戰術以確保台海情勢的現況?_x000D_ 二、中國對美國軍售的問題將會做出怎麼樣回應?美國軍售是否會導致兩岸的軍備競賽,進而促成「飛彈防衛系統」在該地區的部署? 和_x000D_ 三、一旦中美兩國發生衝突,台灣還能否扮演美國的不沉航空母艦?
分類:第14期

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
30314.pdf175.8 kBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟


在 DSpace 系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。