完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | 陳哲三 | |
| dc.contributor.other | Che-San Chen | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-08-25T07:06:52Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2020-08-25T07:06:52Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2012/10/31 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1682-587N | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dspace.fcu.edu.tw/handle/2376/2532 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本文以乾隆十六年十二月八日夜、十一日夜，發生在彰化縣屬內凹莊、柳樹湳汛，生番殺害佃民及汛兵的案件來探討當時漢移民和原住民之間的關係。乾隆十六年十二月，是西元1752 年1 月。所以是十八世紀中葉。_x000D_ 自本文的研究，事件之所以發生，是從皇帝到地方文武都歧視原住民，平日不能公平對待，任由墾戶佃民汛兵作踐欺凌。簡經是墾戶，他贌墾北投社公共草地卻不依約納租。欠租十幾年，北投社上告知府追討，知府二年後的審斷不能維持社會正義。致引起北投社的公憤，三甲是南北投社通事，在官方不能維持正義之下，只得自力救濟。他的辦法是勾引內山生番出來殺佃民和汛兵。本案驚動北京的乾隆皇帝，到乾隆十九年才得到一個比較合乎正義的判決。此後的漢番關_x000D_ 係，大致維持在和平的情況下，直到道光年間北投社領頭與中部五族平埔族人遷入埔里，中台灣漢番間的緊張關係才漸漸劃下休止符。 | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | 逢甲大學 | |
| dc.format.extent | 31 | |
| dc.language.iso | 中文 | |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | 逢甲人文社會學報 | |
| dc.relation.isversionof | 第十九期 | |
| dc.subject | 族群問題 | |
| dc.subject | 漢番關係 | |
| dc.subject | 內凹莊 | |
| dc.subject | 柳樹湳汛 | |
| dc.subject | 三甲 | |
| dc.subject.other | Ethnic conflict | |
| dc.subject.other | Han-Aborigine relationship | |
| dc.subject.other | Nei-ao-zhuang village | |
| dc.subject.other | Liu-shu-nan-xun post | |
| dc.subject.other | Sanjia | |
| dc.title | 18 世紀中葉中台灣的漢番關係─以彰化縣內凹莊、柳樹湳汛番殺兵民事件為例 | |
| dc.title.alternative | The Relationship between Hans and Aborigines in Central Taiwan in the Mid-eighteenth Century—A Case Study of the Nei-ao-zhuang and Liu-shu-nan-xun Massacres in Changhua County | |
| dc.type | 期刊篇目 | |
| dc.description.translationabstract | This paper explores the relationship between Han immigrants and aborigines in the mid-eighteenth century in central Taiwan by investigating a tragic incident: The mountain aborigines murdered Han sharecroppers and garrisons respectively in_x000D_ Nei-ao-zhuang village and Liu-shu-nan-xun post in Changhua County on January 23rd and 26th in 1752. This paper takes the incident as a case study._x000D_ The paper finds the cause of the incident was largely attributed to the discrimination against aborigines from the Emperor himself to the local administrators who, for the same reason, allowed Han garrisons, sharecroppers and small-farmers to_x000D_ mistreat and bully plain aborigines with connivance. In an everyday routine, plain_x000D_ aborigines suffered from injustice which caused the incident to happen. Jianjing, a Han small-farmer who rented the common greens from the plain aborigines in Peitoushe (hereinafter, Peitoushe), refused to pay his rent for ten years. Peitoushe therefore appealed to the local magistrate in hope of collecting the rent. After a two-year trial, the magistrate made an unjust judgment, and provoked the public indignation among Peitoushe. Sanjia, the representative of Nan-Peitoushe, finding the magistrate’s incapability of fulfilling social justice, turned himself to alternative means: He intrigued the mountain aborigines to the plain to kill the Han garrisons and sharecroppers. The two massacres brought to the Emperor’s notice, and there was_x000D_ finally a retrial of the lawsuit. As a result, a somewhat just judgment came into being three years later in 1755, and the Han-Aborigine relationship apparently stayed peaceful. However, the intense relationship between Hans and Aborigines in central Taiwan had not been truly eased until Peitoushe led other five tribes of Pingpu aborigines to immigrate to Puli in the Daoguang era. | |
| 分類: | 第19期 | |
在 DSpace 系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。