完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | 瞿志蓁 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | 林宜萱 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | 朱鴻凱 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | 林蒂佳 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | 邱莉婷 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | 蘇佑軒 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳喬彥 | zh_TW |
| dc.date | 114學年度第2學期 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-10-08T05:29:17Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-10-08T05:29:17Z | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2026-10-08 | |
| dc.identifier.other | E1336072、E1336158、E1335406、E1333404、E1366115、E1480678、E1475653 | zh_TW |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dspace.fcu.edu.tw/handle/2376/5216 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 中文摘要 本報告以友達光電股份有限公司永續報告書為研究對象,旨在評估其永續資 訊揭露品質,並探討報告書與國際永續揭露趨勢之接軌程度。研究依據第 19 屆 臺灣企業永續獎(TCSA)2.1 版評選標準,從報告書完整性、可信度、溝通性及 永續績效等面向進行內容分析與評分。評估結果顯示,友達光電永續報告書整體 得分為 97.6 分,顯示其在治理架構、利害關係人溝通、環境與社會績效揭露,以 及第三方確信等方面具有高度完整性與透明度。然而,分析亦發現三項可再精進 之處:第一,重大主題分析雖已納入利害關係人觀點,但雙重重大性的判定程序 與量化依據仍可更明確;第二,氣候相關財務資訊與 IFRS S1 及 IFRS S2 準則的 對應關係有待加強;第三,目前確信範圍與確信程度仍可逐步擴大。據此,本報 告建議友達光電強化雙重重大性評估方法,建立永續資訊與財務影響的連結,並 逐步提升第三方確信範圍及品質,以增進永續資訊的可比較性、可信度與決策有 用性。研究結果可供企業持續改善永續報告書,以及其他企業規劃永續資訊揭露 時參考。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract This report evaluates the quality of sustainability disclosure in the sustainability report of AU Optronics Corporation (AUO) and examines the extent to which the report aligns with emerging international sustainability disclosure practices. Content analysis and scoring were conducted using the Taiwan Corporate Sustainability Awards (TCSA) 2.1 criteria for the 19th awards, covering report completeness, credibility, communication quality, and sustainability performance. The results indicate that AUO’s sustainability report achieved an overall score of 97.6, demonstrating a high level of completeness and transparency in corporate governance, stakeholder engagement, environmental and social performance disclosure, and third-party assurance. Nevertheless, three areas warrant further improvement. First, although stakeholder perspectives are incorporated into the materiality assessment, the procedures and quantitative criteria used to determine double materiality could be explained more explicitly. Second, the connection between climate-related financial information and the disclosure requirements of IFRS S1 and IFRS S2 should be strengthened. Third, the scope and level of external assurance could be expanded progressively. Accordingly, this report recommends that AUO enhance its double-materiality assessment methodology, establish clearer links between sustainability issues and financial impacts, and improve the scope and quality of third-party assurance. These measures would increase the comparability, credibility, and decision usefulness of its sustainability information. The findings may serve as a reference for AUO’s continuing improvement and for other companies preparing sustainability disclosures. | zh_TW |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目次 中文摘要 ........................................................................................................................ i Abstract ........................................................................................................................ ii 圖目次 .......................................................................................................................... iv 表目次 ........................................................................................................................... v 第一章 緒論 ................................................................................................................. 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 ..................................................................................... 1 第二節 研究目的與研究貢獻 ............................................................................. 2 第三節 研究問題 ................................................................................................. 3 第四節 研究架構與章節安排 ............................................................................. 3 第二章 產業環境與公司概況 ..................................................................................... 6 第一節 台灣光電產業概況與 ESG 特性 .......................................................... 6 第二節 友達光電公司簡介與經營現況 ............................................................. 7 第三節 友達商業模式與雙軸轉型佈局 ............................................................. 9 第四節 友達永續治理架構與組織沿革 ........................................................... 11 第三章 研究設計與評比方法 ................................................................................... 14 第一節 分析對象與資料來源 ........................................................................... 14 第二節 永續報告書揭露品質之評分量表設計 ............................................... 15 第四章 友達永續報告書之揭露品質綜合評比分析 ............................................... 19 第一節 重大性議題鑑別流程與矩陣分析 ....................................................... 20 第二節 環境面向(E)與重大永續規範揭露分析 ......................................... 22 第三節 社會(S)與治理面向(G)實質績效分析 ...................................... 25 第四節 報告書可信度機制:內部控制與外部確信 ....................................... 28 第五節 實體報告書之溝通性評比分析 ........................................................... 30 第六節 網際網路應用及內容品質(多媒體)評比分析 ............................... 32 第七節 友達永續報告書綜合評比結果 ........................................................... 35 第五章 友達光電之 ESG 重大風險與財務實質影響分析 ................................... 39 第一節 友達永續風險之定義與鑑別 ............................................................... 39 第二節 關鍵永續風險對財務報表之實質傳導與衝擊 ................................... 41 第六章 結論與建議 ................................................................................................... 45 第一節 研究結論 ............................................................................................... 45 第二節 對於友達光電非財務資訊揭露之具體修訂建議 ............................... 47 第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議 ................................................................... 49 參考文獻 ..................................................................................................................... 52 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 59p. | zh_TW |
| dc.language.iso | zh | zh_TW |
| dc.rights | openbrowse | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 友達光電 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 永續報告書 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 雙重重大性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | IFRS S1/S2 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | TCSA 2.1 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | AU Optronics (AUO) | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Double Materiality | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | IFRS S1/S2 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Sustainability Report | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | TCSA 2.1 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | 友達光電企業永續報告書評審 | zh_TW |
| dc.title.alternative | Evaluation and Rating of AU Optronics Sustainability Report | zh_TW |
| dc.type | UndergraReport | zh_TW |
| dc.description.course | ESG 永續報告書評審實務 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.department | 商學進修學士學位學程, 商學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.instructor | 黃, 琝琇 | |
| dc.description.instructor | 吳, 清池 | |
| dc.description.instructor | 劉, 世慶 | |
| dc.description.instructor | 黃, 錦華 | |
| dc.description.instructor | 陳, 波宏 | |
| dc.description.programme | 商學進修學士學位學程, 商學院 | zh_TW |
| 分類: | 商114學年度 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1142-047.pdf | 3.91 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
在 DSpace 系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。