完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | 汪在莒 | |
| dc.contributor.author | 林金杉 | |
| dc.contributor.other | Tasi-chu Wang | |
| dc.contributor.other | Chin-shan Lin | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-08-25T06:58:00Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2020-08-25T06:58:00Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2012/10/19 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1682-587N | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dspace.fcu.edu.tw/handle/2376/2453 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究主要目的在瞭解逢甲大學學生對體育課教學的滿意度，並比較不同背景變項的學生滿意度差異狀況。研究者利用改編之「逢甲大學體育教學滿意度調查問卷」為研究工具，研究對象為逢甲大學大二（含）以上學生。研究採用立意抽樣法，共計收集有效問卷401份，並將回收資料經描述統計、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析及薛費法事後考驗等統計方法，分析結果如下：_x000D_ 一、逢甲大學學生對體育課教學滿意度平均數為3.50，各因素的滿意程度依序為教師能力、運動學習、場地設備及體育行政等因素。_x000D_ 二、不同性別學生對體育教學滿意度，在場地設備及體育行政的滿意度上有顯著差異，男生較女生滿意度為高。_x000D_ 三、不同年級學生對體育教學滿意度未達顯著差異。_x000D_ 四、不同性別的體育教師滿意度上未達顯著差異。_x000D_ 五、不同規律運動次數學生對體育教學滿意度上未達顯著差異。_x000D_ 建議未來體育課程的設計與安排上，能利用有限場地妥善規劃，開發符合學生需求與兼具趣味、活潑、體適能提升成效佳的課程，以提高學生修習體育課程的滿意度。 | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | 逢甲大學 | |
| dc.format.extent | 18 | |
| dc.language.iso | 中文 | |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | 逢甲人文社會學報 | |
| dc.relation.isversionof | 第十期 | |
| dc.subject | 體育教學 | |
| dc.subject | 滿意度 | |
| dc.subject.other | physical education | |
| dc.subject.other | Satisfaction | |
| dc.title | 逢甲大學體育教學滿意度之研究 | |
| dc.title.alternative | Feng-Chia University Students’ Satisfaction among Physical Education Programs | |
| dc.type | 期刊篇目 | |
| dc.description.translationabstract | The purpose of this study was to identify the Feng-Chia University students’ satisfaction among physical education programs, and differed satisfaction among selected demographic variables of students. “Feng-Chia University students’ _x000D_ satisfaction among physical education programs scale” was administered as research instrument. Judgment sampling total 401 questionnaires was collected. Data obtained was analyzed by the exploratory factor analysis, one-way ANOVA and pair t-test. The study results were as followed: _x000D_ 1. Feng-Chia University students’ satisfaction among physical education programs average score was 3.50. On the aspect of factors order, Professional competence is the highest, and then, in sequence, learning effectiveness, equipments, and school administration management. _x000D_ 2. Significant difference in satisfaction with physical education programs was found with regard to the different sex, male students’ satisfaction was higher than female’. _x000D_ 3. None significant difference in satisfaction among physical education programs was found with regard to the different grade students’. _x000D_ 4. None significant difference in satisfaction among physical education programs was found with regard to the different sex physical education teachers. _x000D_ 5. None significant difference in satisfaction among physical education programs was found with regard to the different habit of regular exercise. _x000D_ Recommend the devising and arranging physical education programs in the future, well-arranged planning the finite field to capitalize on teaching. Develop the programs to fit students’ demand, including interest, lively, fitness increase and so on. The final purpose is to raise students’ satisfaction among physical education _x000D_ programs. | |
| 分類: | 第10期 | |
在 DSpace 系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。